Brummett Offers John McCain As Refutation Against Fact That Climate Is Cooling And Carbon Follows Warming

"On global warming, or climate change, this seems to be the prevailing science: Empirical data says that, yes, the Earth’s climate is changing, indeed warming."

First of all, it's important to note that Brummett is using the term "climate change" in addition to GLOBAL WARMING!!! There's a reason for that. Brummett contends that the climate is warming, despite the fact that the climate has been cooling since 1998. But remember, John has already announced that he isn't as interested in "facts" as he is in "truth", even if facts are kind of important to establishing truth.

"Prevailing science also is that modern man releases a lot of damaging matter into the atmosphere — carbon, greenhouse gases."

Again, John is repeating talking points as if they haven't already been disproved. Scientific actually shows that carbon follows warming. It doesn't drive it. Another inconvenient truth.

"I don’t know the science. Leave me out of the science. I turn to John McCain. Yes, sir. John McCain.

"He said in the presidential race that he believed global warming to be so and that modern man’s activities were, to some disputed extent, responsible or exacerbating. But he said that, either way, it would be good of us to find a way to limit our unhealthy emissions, simply as responsible stewards of the planet."

That's rich. Are you actually trying to influence us by citing a politician as a scientist after pointing out that politicians aren't scientists and that you don't understand the science? Why not cite Algore while you're at it? That still doesn't prove anything. FYI, John: That's wasn't something that got us to vote for McCain. We voted for him in spite of that.

"And, he (McCain) said, finding a way to limit our unhealthy emissions would create an entire new avenue of economic growth."

Okay... Again, a liberal illustrates his ignorance. If this would drive economic growth, private capital would invest in it without the promise of government subsidies.

"There are jobs in windmills, hybrid cars, recycling and energy-efficient retrofitting of buildings. That would be better economic practice than making bad mortgages and packaging bad securities based on bad mortgages."

Correction: there were jobs in windmills, and those other things, when the price of energy was more expensive. Unfortunately, there are far more efficient sources of energy and types of cars people who live outside Hillcrest would rather drive.

Now, John, stay change the channel, because I'm going to continue to flood it with science that is more compelling than citing John McCain.